Showing posts with label deflation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deflation. Show all posts

Thursday, 19 February 2009

What IS happening to prices?

During the Great Depression prices in the US fell by 10% a year from 1930 - 33. Fears of deflation are obviously weighing heavily in the minds of the Bank of England's MPC (see 'Turn on the printing press' below) But what exactly IS happening to prices in the UK.

On the government's preferred measure of prices (the Consumer Price Index - CPI), prices were UP 3.0% last month compared to January 2007. So what is all the fuss about deflation? Part of the problem is that whilst the CPI shows prices rising the comparisonn is with the same period last year. So prices may be falling but they may still be higher than last January. The expectation is that by the middle of the year CPI will be showing more of the trend that worries the Bank of England.

An alternative measure of prices, the RPI (Retail Price Index), shows prices last month only 0.1% higher than last January. But the RPI includes a measure of mortage interest payments which are falling due to lower interest rates and falling house prices. The correction in house prices is probably in itself desirable. Asset price bubbles as they are known (over-inflated house prices for eaxmple) tend to devote scarce resources away from their most productive uses - a little less obsession with property prices would not be a bad thing. The house price bubble of the last decade is, after all, why we are where we are today and what led to 'creative' banking practices at the root of the credit crunch.

Prices, then, may not be falling and inflation may still be above the Bank of England's target rate of 2%. But, as we have seen, economic indicators can turn on the head of a pin.

Watch this space ...

Useful weblinks

Turn on the printing press

The latest minutes of the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) recorded a unanimous vote in favour of the Bank requesting premission from the Chancellor of the Exchequer to turn on the priniting presses and print more money. In an unprecented move the Governor of the Bank of England is expected to write to Alistair Darling within the next few days.

There has been much about 'quantitative easing' on this blog and in lessons (thanks to Rex Harrison). Here are just t a couple of links which economics students may find useful.

At the end of 2007 while writing a chapter on macroeconomic performance for the new OCR A2 economics textbook, I remember opening to a Study Tip with the words "you live in interesting times" - little did I know HOW interesting times would become!
Useful weblinks

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

Too high, too low - but not 'just right'

The rate of inflation in the UK is falling, whichever measure you look at. According to the latest CPI (Consumer Price Index) inflation was down to 3% last month. On the RPI (Retail Price Index) measure it was close to zero.

In the current climate monetary policy is being driven by a fear of deflation - falling prices. Listen to Stephanie Flanders report on the Bank of England's fears here.

Yet some believe that the slashing of interest rates is stoking up an inflationary problem for 2011. All of this uncertainty means that the period of price stability ushered in by the granting of operational independence to the Bank of England is over. It is anyone's guess whether prices will actually fall (deflation) or whether prices will rise (inflation) dramatically in 18 - 24 months time. According to Stephanie Flanders, the Goldilocks economy (where prices are 'just right') is a thing of the past. This makes things very tricky for the Bank of England ...

My challenge to Yr 12 economics students
Why are there different measures of inflation and does it matter?

Monday, 9 February 2009

Latte lessons

My Year 12 economics classes are now well into their weekly 'latte lesson'. The concept is simple - each Friday morning is a break from the monotony of the specification and a chance to explore something economic that takes the students' fancy. Oh, and the drinks, biscuits, homemade brownies and chocolate tea cakes the presenter must supply!

The result? Some fantastic research, presentations and discussions so far on the Japanese economy and Zimbabwe. And a couple of inches on my waist line too!

Rex Harrison was spurred on to research Japanese economic performance in the 1990s in order to draw lessons about the current economic downturn and the appropriate policy responses. Rex's explanation of quantitative easing was masterly - who will forget his matchstick bankers? I will make his presentation available on the VLE for everyone to download.
In the meantime, as interest rates in the UK fall to 1%, the likelihood of 'quantitative easing' grows stronger. Year 12 students might be interested in this interactive guide to quantitative easing from the FT as a follow up to Rex's presentation. I think the FT may have borrowed the idea from Rex!

Thursday, 8 January 2009

Who and what next?

'Cheers' to Charles Barry (U6) for his blog entry (see below). Anyone else want to join us?

1,200 job losses announced by M&S. Another 1,200 jobs lost at Nissan, Sunderland, the UK's most productive car plant. My Year 10 group may be quizzing me tomorrow, after today's discussion of the importance of productivity - guess which car manufacturing plant we were looking at?

Britain's oldest name in the clothing industry, Viyella, goes into administration (or at least part of the business does). The Sofa Workshop is on the brink of administration. Who is next? The impact of the recession deepens by the week - by the day would not be an exaggeration.

And UK interest rates come down to their lowest level since the Bank of England was founded in 1694. As Charles has explained there is a limit to how far interest rates can fall. With 0.5 percentage points knocked off the base rate today, the UK is now reaching this limit. What next? Will we see 'quantitative easing' and deliberate 'printing' of money to prevent the UK entering a period of deflation? Maybe. When the very politicians that gave the Bank of England its operational independence just over 10 years ago start talking about having a say in monetary policy you know that you are living in historic times. I first started to study economics at the height of 'monetarism' - a theory (actually more than that, as it provided the bedrock to a whole new political philosophy - Thatcherism) which urged governments to restrict the growth of the money supply. For an independent central bank to be contemplating deliberate expansion of the money supply is an even bigger shock than the return to fashion of Keynesian demand management.

What intrigues me about this is the battle for control over monetary policy which I suspect will grow over the coming months. Alistair Darling is effectively saying that responsibility for monetary policy decisions will now revert back to politicians. As an economist this scares me, but it doesn't surprise me. Monetary policy decisions made for political reasons are apt to destablise rather than stabilise the economy. And there is now talk of a further boost to government spending too. Economists don't always agree about appropriate policy responses, but at least the debate can be rational and objective. I know who I would want with their hands on the tiller.

Useful weblinks

Saturday, 20 December 2008

"Quantitative Easing" - A way forward?

About roughly a month ago, I asked Mr Walton that perhaps, with the threat of deflation looming, the best thing for the Bank of England to do would be to print more money. My thinking was that by printing more money, the government would be literally shoving more money into the economy, which would in turn stem off deflation and potentially help to self-right the economy.

Sadly, as it was the end of period 3, Mr Walton gave me one of those looks which said "I really want to go and have a cup of tea", quickly mumbled "Yes" and made a sharpish exit from the room.

Now, without wishing to sound like I am the new prophet of the credit crunch or anything, looking at the papers now, my prediction seems to have come true.

Only 4 days ago the Open Market Committee of the US Federal Reserve (the American equivalent to the Monetary Policy Committee) announced its intention to start buying mortgage-backed securities (the supposed 'dodgy debt' that caused the credit crunch in the first place). Where would the money for this come from? The short answer: nowhere. The Federal Reserve will simply create money, electronically or through printing, to use to buy this 'toxic debt'.

Now, the upside for this is obvious: by putting money straight into the economy through such purchases, there are strong cash injections into the economy. Best of all, the government gets to do this for free. This will improve liquidity, allowing banks to start lending and business thus to start investing. It will reduce the cost of borrowing, allowing consumers and business alike more breathing space, reducing any potential falls in GDP and increases in unemployment.

You might start to wonder, however - since this is all so good, why don't we do it all the time? Well, as the saying goes, there's no such thing as a free lunch. The main danger with printing more money is that it has a strong inflationary pressure upon the economy. Milton Friedman won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1976 for, amongst other things, the simple equation:

MV=PQ

Where M is the Money Supply, V is the speed at which money circulates through the economy, P is the price level (ie the level of inflation) and Q is the real economic output. Increasing the supply of money, by printing more of it, will increase inflation and/or GDP growth.

This effect can be so extraordinary that in Zimbabwe, where the government has been printing money for years, the economy suffers Hyperinflation. This is the rather comical situation where inflation reaches levels that devalue the currency so much that the economy cannot function properly. The official inflation level in Zimbabwe is 231,000,000%, meaning that when the $100 billion dollar note was introduced last October, it was only worth 8p.

However, inflation is not our main concern. We are currently experiencing a demand side slump in the world economy. Demand side slumps, or falls in the Aggregate Demand of the economy lead to higher unemployment, lower inflation (or possibly deflation) and falling economic output. The threat is actually from the pessimistic and demoralised economic situation that deflation can cause, and the economic depression that may result from the declines in consumer spending and reductions in employment levels of recent times.

Overall then, printing more money is potentially the only way forward. We are nearing the end of the usefulness of interest rates as a means of controlling the economy. In fact, low interest rates, as seen in Japan in the 1990s, may prove counter-productive (though something called "The Liquidity Trap" - where returns are so low that investment in anything is severely discouraged and people simply hoard money). In the short run, printing money may prove to be the most useful tool available to the government. But even in the medium term, it must avoid using it as a "magic bullet", a fix-all cure, and must know when to stop.

Otherwise we could leave the recession to find ourselves waking up to a inflationary crisis in 5 years time.

Further Info:

Forget Hard Choices. We need pampering - Anatole Kaletsky, The Times.
Press Release of 16th December - The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
Federal Reserve slashes Interest Rates to zero - Larry Elliot and Ashley Seager, The Guardian
Deflation: Making sure it doesn't happen here - Ben Bernanke, Governor, US Federal Reserve

Friday, 28 November 2008

What is deflation?

Completely out of the blue, someone in my Year 12 economics set asked me what deflation is. Apparently, there had been some discussion of this in a politics lesson and it was throught a good idea to refer the question to the economists! How wise. Best not to trust the politicians when it comes to anything to do with prices.

All the talk for the last 10 years has been about bearing down on INFLATION - the sustained increase in the general level of prices. So, why should DEFLATION matter?

Deflation is a sustained decrease in the general level of prices. 'Great', you may say. If things are getting cheaper then surely that must be good news? Well, no. If prices are continuously falling, what's the point of buying now when you can wait for prices to drop even further? If we all think like this, then spending will drop. If spending drops, overall demand drops. As demand drops that affects output. If output falls, that means jobs are lost. Defaltion matters because it causes us to hang on to our money rather than spend it and that means prolonged recession.

My challenge
A reward for the best account of the problems of deflation with an illustration from the recent economic performance of Japan.

Useful weblinks